by Jenna Blumenfeld | newhope360
Though numerous organizations praise the good organic word (and criticize genetically engineered technology), it was announced today that two influential, natural players will join forces to further bolster the USDA Organic seal. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) and Organic Voices, the umbrella organization behind the Just Label It campaign, will partner to accelerate two crucial facets of the natural products industry.
“There are two pieces to this collaboration,” said Scott Faber, vice president of government affairs for the EWG who will also serve as executive director of Organic Voices. “One piece of our advocacy will be on behalf of GE labeling, primarily in Washington, D.C., but also supporting the states. The other, separate piece will be through helping consumers understand the benefits of buying organic.”
The EWG and Organic Voices plan to launch a new website and a social media campaign to remind shoppers that organic guarantees no toxins harmful to workers and the environment were used in food production, and that they don't contain GMOs. “It’s time for Americans to join the other 3 billion [international] consumers who have a right to know what’s in their food,” Faber said. Indeed, a new poll conducted by the Huffington Post and YouGov found that 82 percent of adults thought GMOs should be labeled (8 percent were not sure).
The catalyst for this collaboration stemmed from mounting consumer distrust of America’s food system. The widely publicized defeat of California’s Prop 37 exacerbated this sentiment. During Prop 37’s fever pitch last November, a slew of infographics (like this one from the Cornucopia Institute) tracking the stream of pro-or-no campaign dollars empowered consumers to comprehend which companies may be concealing information.
As a result, some non-GMO advocates lambasted organic biggies such as Silk, Back to Nature and Kashi—companies owned by food conglomerates Dean Foods, Kraft and Kelloggs, respectively. “Consumers really hate to feel deceived, especially by brands they have come to trust for their shared values, such as using organically grown ingredients,” wrote public health lawyer Michelle Simon. “By not disclosing the ownership up front, these companies risk alienating loyal consumers down the road when they find out eventually, and in this case, in a non-flattering way.”
Is the fight worth the damage?
Faber, who was former head lobbyist for the Grocery Manufacturers Association, believes Big Food is realizing this consumer dissonance. “Many food companies are reaching the conclusion that the fight is worse than the label—fighting GMO labeling is damaging consumer confidence.”
Click here to read the rest of this article at NewHope360.